Following the broadband money

And so B4RN begins, despite BT

with 7 comments

Digging for victory. Copyright Michael Pye

Yesterday the dig began for the first phase of B4RN, the UK’s first community owned fibre to the home (FTTH) network.

The network promises to bring 1Gbps symmetric internet access to rural Lancashire communities that had little or no hope of ever receiving even a 2Mbps service from BT, the area’s only other broadband provider.

B4RN came about after a series of interventions that helped BT to keep its monopoly in the area. Firstly Chris Conder, who ran a  community wireless broadband network Wray, faced closure after BT and the Lancashire County Council set up a joint venture that took over her backhaul supplier, the Cumbria and Lancashire Education Online (Cleo) network.

Later Barry Forde, who designed the Cleo network, was denied a £750,000 ERDP grant via the Lancaster City Council to build a fibre link between the villages of Quernmore and Over Wyresdale.

The county council later issued a £40m tender for a a firm to supply a county-wide broadband network under the BDUK procurement framework standards. This meant residents in these upland villages were unlikely to get even 2Mbps service, unless via satellite.

BT’s efforts to make life difficult for competitors in Lancashire appear to have continued.  There is an ongoing Twitter stream designed to instill fear, uncertainty and doubt about B4RN’s viability (and other initiatives) by Bill Broadband (@watchingtheflow). This is believed to be the Twitter identity of Bill Murphy, the man in charge of BT’s next generation network roll-out.

For example:

Lancashire County Council said in January BT has won a £32m tender to supply broadband to the “Final Third” of Lancashire homes and businesses.  But recent tweets by Bill suggested the LCC cabinet had issued a press release that indicated the deadline for BT’s roll-out. I could not find such a release, nor evidence that the LCC cabinet had met in March to discuss the topic or the release.

I am a B4RN shareholder. Question is: is Bill Broadband a BT shareholder, or have some other vested interest in killing competition to BT?


Written by Br0kenTeleph0n3

2012/04/01 at 13:56

7 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I don’t think its Bill Murphy, the tweets are very stupid and he never answers anyone’s questions. I don’t think BT have anything to do with it, its probably just a troll. 😉

    I do think BT have taken over our county council though, and rural areas will not get much help from them. All we can expect like you say is the 2meg USC and that is about as much use these days as tits on a bull. (as my other half would say)


    2012/04/01 at 14:08

    • I hope what you say is true and that Bill Broadband is simply a troll. However, the real Bill Murphy should be aware that someone is taking his name in vain. Allowing this to go on without public refutation and disassociation from “Bill Broadband” and his comments is not doing his, or BT’s, reputation much good. Perhaps someone should tell Mr Murphy what being done, apparently in his name.

      Ian Grant

      2012/04/01 at 19:41

    • Chris – why have you and Lins blocked me on Twitter?


      2012/04/01 at 20:27

  2. great work chaps

    how many homes did you connect today? And what speed are you connecting to your transit/backhaul provider?



    2012/04/01 at 14:23

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: